In peacetime, a
Climate Change Criminal, is a politician,
industrialist or other entity that conducts
themselves and/or their policies such as to (in effect) murder
another human being from starvation or poisoning resulting from
action or inaction on their part, including dumping plastic in
philosophy extends to causing hardship and stress, contrary to
Articles 2 and 3 of the EU's Human Rights Convention and Articles
3 and 5
of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights, by way of inhuman treatment - such as disregarding
displacement and flooding. Disregarding shortages of food and
affordable homes and energy, and disregarding lung
cancer from IC vehicle exhausts.
THINKER 3 NOVEMBER 2018
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Democratic candidate for Congress from New York's 14th Congressional District (the Bronx and Queens), recently compared dealing with those who deny climate change and oppose her party's measures to counter this "existential threat" to fighting the Nazis in
We owe Ms. Ocasio-Cortez a high degree of thanks for this important warning, but one awakening has to occur before we can take full advantage of its true value. When it comes to "climate change" as well as other "environmentalist" issues, it is Ocasio-Cortez and her party who have more in common with Hitler's Third Reich than the Republicans and conservatives who oppose them and whom they smear as "Nazis" with remarks like hers.
Please note that I'm not saying liberal environmentalists are Nazis, nor that they are anti-Semitic or want to start a world war. However, since Ocasio-Cortez (and other Democrats) brought the Nazis into this discussion, there are striking similarities between these two political movements – sufficient similarities that the Bronx Democrat's warning should have our alarm lights flashing, big time! The fact that modern Democrats share with the Nazis the claim that the only way to heal what ails this planet and perhaps even prevent the demise of all of humanity is to put them in power certainly has my alarms flashing.
In "The Nazi Roots of the Global Warming Scare" by Kerry Jackson in Investor's Business Daily, Rupert Darwall, author of Green Tyranny, is quoted as having stated, in an interview with Encounter Books, "If you look at what the Nazis were doing in the 1930s, in their environmental policies, virtually every theme you see in the modern environmental movement, the Nazis were doing[.]"
Among those themes common to the modern environmental movement and the 1930s Nazis was "climate change." In "The Nazi Origins of
Renewable Energy (and Global
Warming)," David Archibald wrote that the first German-language article (perhaps the first political article) on "human-caused climate change" was created in 1941 by Hermann Flohn, a scientist for the German Meteorological Service who became the chief meteorologist for the Luftwaffe High Command. The title of that article translates as "The Activity of Man as a Climate Factor."
That is just the tip of this "common theme" iceberg. In order to pursue their stated goal of "preventing harm to the environment," Hitler's Third Reich passed the Reichsnaturschutzgesetz (Reich Nature Protection Law) in 1933. According to Duncan Bayne in "How to Spot a Nazi," the purpose of this act was to increase control over the German populace by requiring that decisions on how a person could use his property be first approved by the Reich. Sound familiar?
Further confirming the Reich's identification as a "Green" party and its similarity to America's liberal Democrats: the Nazis were among the first, if not the first, to enact laws to protect wilderness and endangered species. Granted, the species and the forests protected were examples iconic of Germany. Nevertheless, the "common theme" connection remains. In addition, the Nazis passed the first animal rights laws and the first anti-vivisection law, and they were the first to protect
wolves in 1930s Germany. Liberals, mostly Democrats, have passed similar measures in the modern U.S.
Where does this lead, and why should we take warning? An author known for his insights, H.L. Mencken, wrote in his book Prejudices: First Series, "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule."
Providing support for that insight, the campaigns of the Nazis of the 1930s and the liberal Democrats of today are both based on the contention that not putting their political party in charge of humankind's relationship to planet Earth, to all its plants and animals, and to one another will cause everything (including the ecosystem, habitat, weather/climate...) to deteriorate, get worse, perhaps even cause the demise of humankind.
In other words, the real common theme between these two movements, and plenty of others like them, is, if all problems can be traced to your opponents, the only solution to everything is...you.
What's an alternative to this "put us in charge or we're all going to die" madness? The U.S. solution: Give people the freedom to recognize problems, environmental as well as otherwise, and address those problems with practical rather than political solutions. That pits us against our problems rather than against each other.
Synergies made possible by free enterprise and free elections in the U.S. have solved more problems, environmental, economic, and political, and have sustained more freedoms in the process, than any "put us in charge or else" regimes anywhere on the planet.
As a matter of fact, if (or when) the climate ever does begin to change in a manner that requires action on our part, whether that change is caused by nature or by us, it is a much better bet that an effective means to deal with that change will come to us via pragmatism rather than dogmatism.
...if we have the freedom to apply it. By Dan Dagget
DIRTIEST DOZEN - WORLD'S WORST - TOP HR VIOLATORS
leaders listed below in order of greenhouse
gas emissions are charged with failing to
protect life on earth, as crimes against humanity and our ecology.
von der Leyen
Mohammed bin Salman
death camp executions. Direct action killing of humans
inconvenient to their cleansing and world domination agenda was
a World War Two horror exemplified by the factory gassing of
concentration camp inmates. Global warming via the burning of
coal and oil may be likened to the gas ovens, except for the
speed and indirect nature of heating, that removes the
perpetrators from the scene of the crime. A crime nevertheless.
comparison in no way trivializes the suffering and murder of the six million men, women and children who died at the hands of
the Nazi regime from 1930 to 1945. We unreservedly apologize in
advance should any reference to historical events cause concern.
For the avoidance of doubt, The Holocaust, was a deliberate and systematic genocide, entirely different from
any claims by fringe activists as to perceived climate apathy.
the other hand, where corporate and political objectives are to
increase coal and oil use, in the full knowledge that it will
cause human suffering, one cannot ignore that such agendas
constitute indirect killing of humans and other animals - for
times of war, a criminal in a person who kills an unarmed human being or
gives the order to kill another human being outside the normal
rules of engagement in times of war.
phenomenon is not limited to Nazi Germany, there are many
examples of war crimes from US and Japanese engagements all over the world
and many other countries where basic human
rights are thrown to the wind.
Court of Human Rights is itself guilty of oppression in that
they filter out cases that should properly be heard, on the slightest
pretext, and offer no explanation for saying that a case in
ineligible. There is a total lack of transparency in SDG
terms. Hence, the European Court in Strasbourg, France, is a
Human Rights violation abomination - instead of a paragon of virtue.
- Nazi officers with all the traits that Hitler thought
exemplified his Master Race, were encouraged to impregnate as
many women as possible, by way of a selective breeding campaign.
Taken a stage further, those not contributing to society, such
as the elderly and infirm - might also find their lives cut
short. In the UK, health treatment is deliberately slow with
long waiting time for operations. Even if this is not a
deliberate agenda to dispose of the retired drawing pensions, as
an economy boosting ploy, it sure as hell works in the same way
as the gas chambers, only a little slower. In 2021, Matt Hancock
is the Health Minister and Rishi Sunack,
SS officer named Philipp
Bouhler was responsible for the killing of disabled
German citizens. By order of Hitler (backdated to 1 September 1939),
Bouhler with Karl Brandt developed the Nazis' early euthanasia program,
Aktion T4 in which mentally ill and physically handicapped people were
killed. The actual implementation was supervised by Bouhler. Various
methods of killing were tried out. The first killing facility was
Schloss Hartheim in Upper Austria. The knowledge gained from the
euthanasia program was later applied to the industrialized annihilation
of other groups of people, such as Jewish people.
In 1941 Bouhler and Heinrich Himmler initiated Aktion
14f13. Bouhler instructed the head of the Hauptamt II ("main office ll")
of Hitler's Chancellery, the Oberdienstleiter Viktor Brack to implement
this order. Brack was already in charge of the various front operations
The scheme operated under the Concentration Camps
Inspector and the Reichsführer-SS under the name "Sonderbehandlung
14f13". The combination of numbers and letters was derived from the SS
record-keeping system and consists of the number "14" for the
Inspector, the letter "f" for the German word "deaths" (Todesfälle) and
the number "13" for the means of killing, in this case, for
in the T4 killing centers. "Sonderbehandlung" ("special
action"—literally "special handling") was the euphemistic term for
execution or killing.
In 1942, Bouhler published the book "Napoleon
– Kometenbahn eines Genies" (Napoleon – A Genius's Cometary Path),
which became a favorite of Hitler's. He had also published a National
Socialist publication Kampf um Deutschland (Fight for Germany) in 1938.
Hitler and chum Heinrich Himmler [Allegedly,
Adolf Hitler did not die in that bunker incident C.1949.
Apparently, he was fired into England, strapped to a V1 rocket, leaving
behind his false teeth. He parachuted into Wealden that night
hoping to meet some deviants, who'd arranged a new identity for their
fallen comrade. Apparently, he landed in Crowborough, shaved off
his moustache and was mistaken for a council official, whereupon he
infiltrated the ranks of the local council and trained them how to use his
terror tactics to control the peasant civilians.
Reich Minister Propaganda
Please use our A-Z INDEX
to navigate this site